ARY’s effort to make ‘Dr Death’ a champion journalist finds no takers


By Iram Salim

( The ‘sad’ part of banning Dr Shahid Mmasood by the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra) episode is the ARY News and its anchors like Arshad Sharif are chiding Pemra days and nights for banning ‘stalwart anchor’ despite the fact he remained completely controversial throughout his career.

Dr Shahid Masood commonly known “Dr Death” after he did controversial programs on ‘End of the World’. Later he joined PTV as its managing director. Once he was removed from the post and he reportedly received six-month salary and other perks in advance. Later he showed his ‘professionalism’ and launched scathing rather filthy criticism on Zardari and company for booting him out of PTV. Geo was his favourite destination that time because it used to target Zardari on daily basis.

Later he was shown the door from the Geo News and after finding refuge in one private news channel and another he finally was pardoned by Salman Iqbal, CEO ARY, for ditching the channel. He was taken on board recently by the ARY.

 Now it is shameful to see Arshad Sharif like anchors to take on Absar Alam, who no doubt is the PML-N journalist, for his love for ‘Dr Death’ sorry… Shahid Masood.

The ARY should better wait for the court decision on its petition challenging Pemra ban instead of blindly and foolishly making pathetic Masood a champion journalist and urging journalist bodies to take sides with him.

LAST Week PEMRA said “Dr Shahid Masood alleged — in a programme aired on June 22 — that the son of the Sindh High Court chief justice was kidnapped because the chief justice took a bribe and then did not make good on his promises.”

According to Pemra, a show-cause notice was issued on July 19 and the channel was given seven days to respond, but the reply received on July 23 was “unprofessional” and no apology was tendered.

The statement issued by the electronic media watchdog said the case was referred to its Council of Complaints in Karachi and the channel’s representatives were asked to appear before it on August 4.

“On the date of the hearing, the channel sought an adjournment and council granted adjournment for another seven days,” the statement said, adding “but the representative of the channel neither tendered any apology for the serious allegation nor presented a satisfactory reply.”

Under the law, Dr Shahid Masood and his channel reserve the right to appeal the authority’s decision before the high court or the Supreme Court within five days.

ARY News has also posted a statement from its counsel, Advocate Moinuddin, on its website. In it, the counsel notes that Pemra’s decision was apparently taken in haste and “may have some mala fide intent”.

Mr Moinuddin also contended that Pemra did not consider their adjournment plea. “We could have gone to Islam­abad to plead our case, but that chance was not provided to us.”

The advocate also expressed surprise that the Pemra order was not signed by any authority, but rather was simply endorsed by the council of complaints.

In a statement posted on their website, Dr Shahid Masood has asked: “What [could] anyone do if the government [had] misconstrued his statement in the programme”, adding that the government must clearly say what was objectionable in the programme, which stirred up a “hornet’s nest”. – Pak Destiny


  1. Noman Khan Reply
  2. Nawabzada Moin Reply
  3. Haseeb Ahmed Siddiqui Reply
  4. Zafar Hussain Tanwary Reply
  5. Sardar Khan Reply
  6. Hamza Khan Yousfxai Reply
  7. Riazkhan Tareen Reply
  8. Anonymous Reply
  9. Saif Ud Din Ahmad Reply
  10. Sarosh Hassan Shigari Reply
  11. Uzma Imran Reply
  12. M A Hameed Reply
  13. M A Hameed Reply

Leave a Reply

English English Urdu Urdu زبان کا انتخاب کریں